Archive for April, 2007

Lucid US-legal Absinthe

A significant article in todays’s New York Times, announcing what is apparently the first “proper” US-legal absinthe, made by Ted Breaux of Jade Absinthe fame. Called Lucid Absinthe Superieure, it’s made from a recipe including Artemisia absinthium, but tests thujone free.

Release date is late May, initially in New York and LA.

If the product checks out - and given Ted’s involvement it’s likely to, this is important news for the US market - the first product sold in the US to legally carry the word “Absinthe” on the label since Prohibition (Strictly speaking the New Orleans-based Legendre company produced a product called “Legendre Absinthe” in 1934, but this was almost immediately renamed Herbsaint, by which name it’s still called today. There’s lots about Herbsaint, including some great cocktail recipes, in the Virtual Absinthe Museum).

I spoke to Ted earlier today, and he’s very confident both in the quality of the product, and in his ability to continue producing it with no measurable level of thujone. It’s early days yet, but if the demand is there, this is something we might consider including in the line-up at Absinthe Classics.

 Lucid

 

 

Comments (15)

An 1811 Cognac, from the “Comet” vintage

I recently handled one of the finest and most important bottles of cognac in existence - a magnum from the legendary 1811 vintage. A little background:

Pre-phyloxera cognac - that is cognac dating from before 1872, is fundamentally different from modern cognac in a way that isn’t true of most other spirits or other wines. Pre-phyloxera, a Bordeaux vineyard would have been planted with Cabernet Sauvignon, Merlot, Cabernet Franc or Petite Verdot - after phyloxera the same vineyards were replanted with exactly the same varieties, grafted on to American rootstocks. The situation in Cognac was different. The original Cognac vineyards - which are believed to date back to Roman times, were planted almost entirely with Folle Blanche. Folle Blanche is a capricious vine, low yielding and difficult to grow and harvest. Under huge financial pressure, when it come to re-planting the vineyards after phyloxera, the Cognac growers replanted with grafted Ugni Blanche, which yields a less interesting brandy, but is much higher yielding and easier to grow. Today, less than 5% of the total Cognac vineyard is Folle Blanche, the rest is all Ugni Blanche (and the Cognac vineyard is far smaller - just on 80 000 hectares compared to 230 000 hectares in it’s heyday in the mid 19th century).

The change in varietals, changed the taste of the spirit. Pre-phyloxera cognacs are bolder and less refined than today’s blends. They are more floral, more intense, there’s more chocolate and vanilla and licorice aftertaste, and less of the leathery quality often found in modern cognacs. The colour is darker and richer, and the finish is longer.

1811 was regarded at the time as the greatest vintage in living memory, and is now universally held to be the finest vintage of the 19th century throughout the vineyards of Western Europe. A long hot summer and a warm dry autumn meant an abundant harvest of perfectly ripe grapes, from Bordeaux to Burgundy, from the Rheingau to the vineyards of Tokaji. In Cognac, the folle blanche
reached an unequalled level of perfection, and the distillers knew that they were dealing with a once in a lifetime harvest. In the same year, Napoleon himself visited the region, and was presented with a barrel of cognac as a gift for his young son. Many ascribed the extraordinary weather to the remarkable astronomical event that had dominated the year - Halley’s comet. The comet was visible by astronomers for 17 months, but for two months - September and October 1811, exactly the time grapes were harvested - it was clearly visible to the naked eye, illuminating the night sky with a coma that at one point exceeded the diameter of the sun. It was taken as sign of supernatural blessing on the harvest, which henceforth was known as “The Comet Vintage”.

The exceptional quality of 1811 cognac was recognised immediately, and the leading producers marked the vintage either with the date on the bottle, or, more unusually, with a picture of the comet forever associated with the vintage. The date “1811″ or the star (as the comet symbol soon became) were regarded as signs of infallible quality, and the leading producers were not slow to exploit this. By the late nineteenth century there were a plethora of “1811 Cognacs”. Many of these still survive today, and most are very fine, but 95% should correctly be regarded as tributes to the vintage of 1811, rather than as the actual product of the year - producers simply used the designation “1811″ as a way of signifying their very best and oldest blend, regardless of the actual composition of the brandies. In the 1930’s and 1959’s unscrupulous producers mainly in the US re-bottled many ordinary brandies under faked “1811″ labels - these are easy to recognise, but still turn up every year on auction and can fool the unwary.

True cognac of the 1811 vintage can be recognised first and foremost by the bottle, which must clearly date from the 1820’s or 1830’s, when this cognac was originally bottled. It’s extraordinarily rare - whereas for instance Sothebys and Christies routinely have a couple of bottles each year of the late 19th century-bottled 1811’s  - more correctly seen as tributes to the harvest - true
contemporary bottlings are almost never seen.

Truly great cognacs have always been rare. Recognising this, the major houses have usually allocated their very finest bottlings to a very select clientele. At the top of the pecking order have always been the most renowned French restaurants, especially those in Paris, and today the cellars of these establishments are without doubt the principle repository of the finest 19th century cognacs.

This bottle originates from the cellars of a famous restaurant on the Place de la Madeleine that closed in the mid 1950’s. It was then bought by a major French wine collector and remained in his cellar for nearly 50 years. He died recently, and this bottle comes directly from his widow.

The magnum is in perfect condition, with original cork and much of the original wax. The level is just above the base of the neck. It’s blown from heavy, black-green glass and dates from the 1820’s or early 1830’s (more likely the former). Because of the backlighting, it’s darker in reality than it appears in the photos. A single standard 750ml Bordeaux bottle has been added in one of the photos, to give an idea of the dimensions of the bottle.

As a dealer in this field I handle many wonderful vintage bottles, but every now and again something comes up that’s so unique and extraordinary that it’s a real wrench to part with. This bottle is a classic example. 

 

Cognac-1811-Seal-40KB.jpgCognac-1811-Scale-42KB.jpgCognac-1811-Label-34KB.jpgCognac-1811-25KB.jpg

Comments (5)

A sobering lab analysis.

As part of an unrelated project, I recently had the opportunity to have several dozen absinthes, some vintage, some modern, analysed for methanol content. The overall results were that the quality of the alcohol in most vintage absinthes was surprisingly good, on a par with modern absinthes. Most of the samples tested in the range 5-20mg methanol per 100ml of ethanol. This included btw, several different bottles from the 1914 cache. 

There was only one outlier, a bottle of green absinthe dated 1953, from clandestine production in the Val-de-Travers. I obtained this bottle several years ago from a very reliable source in Couvet, and it’s to date the only “vintage” clandestine absinthe I’ve ever found. Over the years, I gave (not sold) a few samples to friends here on the forum. The absinthe had a markedly funky taste, which I ascribed to a distillation pushed too hard, as is often the case with clandestine La Bleues. It didn’t specifically occur to me that the origin of the alcohol could be a problem, as La Bleue, certainly from the late 1970’s, was routinely made with highly rectified spirit purchased from official Swiss sources. I assumed the same situation had applied in the 1950’s.

So it was a surprise, to put it mildly, to find that the methanol content of this ‘53 Verte was off the scale - 3143mg/100ml - more than three times the EU limit of 1000mg/100ml, and more than 60 times the defacto commercial standard of 50mg/100ml. This level of methanol is not possible simply from poorly rectified wine spirits - it indicates without doubt that this absinthe was made from denatured alcohol. Denatured alcohol is industrial alcohol which has been rendered unfit for human consumption, so as to escape the usual taxes on drinking alcohol. The most common form is methylated spirits, which is dosed with 5% methanol (and usually other substances as well). Because it’s virtually tax free as opposed to highly taxed food-grade alcohol it’s always been attractive to moonshiners, and periodically there are casualties from its consumption, usually in Russia, Eastern Europe and the Third World. There are absolutely no cases documented in the scientific literature of methanol poisoning in Switzerland.

It’s important to note that the level of methanol in this sample - 1.6% - while very worryingly high, is not quite at a toxic level. Paine and Davan, in their 2001 paper, concluded that if an adult consumed 4×25-ml of a drink containing 40% vol of alcohol over a period of 2 h, the maximum tolerable concentration of methanol in such a drink would be 2%/vol. Fortunately the concentration in this absinthe was 20% below this level, the samples I sent out were very small, and the absinthe would have been diluted further with water before drinking; so no harm could be done, even in theory. I drank two or three glasses myself from the bottle over the years with no ill-effects. Nonetheless, this is a sobering reminder that non-commercial alcohol should always be treated with extreme caution.

Comments